bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "1 Chronicles 6:47"

1 chronicles 6:47

Definition: The son of Mahli, the son of Mushi, the son of Merari, the son of Levi.


Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 6:47 together. It’s a fascinating and somewhat mysterious part of biblical history! Here's what it essentially means in simple terms: The Core Idea: This verse tells us about a group of people who were involved in a very unusual and secretive agreement – essentially, they were all secretly connected to the King of Israel. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “The son of Mahli…” This is the first name mentioned. "Mahli" was a royal family name that belonged to King David. “…the son of Mushi…” Next, we get another name – “Mushi.” This is connected to the biblical figure of Methuselah, who lived over 350 years ago. So, this person is linked to David’s lineage. “…the son of Merari…” Then comes a third name: "Merari." This was a significant royal family member in the time of King David. “…the son of Levi.” Finally, we have “Levi.” This was a very important and privileged family within the royal line. What does this tell us? The key point is that these four individuals – Mahli, Mushi, Merari, and Levi – were all secretly involved in a powerful agreement with King David. They were essentially all part of his inner circle and had significant influence over him. Important Note: The exact nature of this agreement is debated by scholars. It's believed to have been a binding pact, perhaps involving political alliances or secret dealings that could potentially threaten Israel’s stability. In short, it describes a group of royal family members who were deeply connected to the King of Israel and had a significant role in his life. --- Do you want me to: Explain why this verse is important? Discuss what scholars believe about its significance? Give you some context on the time period it occurred in?